Disposed

Maharastra Gramin Bank v. Swarupanand Vishwanath Deshmukh

DRT20 Oct 2023OA/388/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of an Original Application for settlement of a debt. Learned counsel for the applicant-bank submitted the matter was settled, the account was closed, and the entire amount was received. The Tribunal passed an order dispensing with fees and returning documents.

What did the court decide?

The collateral original application stands disposed off on the basis that the account is closed and the amount has been received.

Maharastra Gramin Bank versus Swarupanand Vishwanath Deshmukh — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2023)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET

¶2

	20.10. Sr. No	2023 .05	OA No. 388/2022
Classifi cation	No. of Exh.
		Maha Versu Swar Rewat bank. None The m 1. 2. 3.	ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 388/2022 rashtra Gramin Bank ..Applicant s upanand Vishwanath Deshmukh & others ..Defendants i Chitaley h/for Mr. S.V. Adwant - Advocate for the applicant- for the defendants. atter is taken through Video Conference. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant-bank submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and the entire amount has been received by the bank and the account is closed. He requests for disposal of the matter. The counsel requests for return of the original documents and also refund of the court fees as per rules. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the applicant-bank, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER
		A.	As the account is closed and nothing remains to be paid the Original Application No.388/2022 stands disposed off.
		B. C. D.	The original title documents, if any filed be returned to the Authorised Officer of the applicant bank as per rules. The court fees be refunded as per rules and as per the orders passed by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. Consign the file to the Record Room.
			(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

¶3

[SBJ] (OA No.388/2022) Page 1 of 1

Maharastra Gramin Bank v. Swarupanand Vishwanath Deshmukh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maharastra Gramin Bank v. Swarupanand Vishwanath Deshmukh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bank of Maharashtra versus Raosaheb Raibhan Sarovar

Rajesaheb Venkatrao Gore versus Punjab National Bank

Mrs Gauri Keshav Kale versus Ahmedabad Mercantile Cooperative Bank

Bank of Baroda versus Rajrajeshwar Electronics and Appliance

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Dattatray Anil Thube

Kiran Bhausaheb Solas versus Phoenix Arc Pvt. Limited