The Tribunal allowed the applicant to withdraw a mistakenly filed Miscellaneous Application and file a Chamber Appeal instead, excluding the interim period from limitation.
M.A. No.66/2023 disposed; applicant permitted to withdraw MA and file Chamber Appeal; interim period excluded from limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 20. Sr. |
10.202 No.81 |
3 MA No.66/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No.66/2023 | ||
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. ..Applicant Versus Dattatrya Anil Thube & another ..Respondents Mr. Pradeep Yadav - Advocate for the applicant. None for the respondents. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. In this matter the learned counsel for the applicant submits that inadvertently they have filed Miscellaneous Application which is actually a Chamber Appeal. He seeks to withdraw the same and file the chamber appeal. |
||
| 2. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing: ORDER |
||
| A. The Miscellaneous Application No.66/2023 stands disposed off. |
||
| B. The applicant is permitted to withdraw the Miscellaneous Application No.66/2023 and file the Chamber Appeal. C. The period from filing of this M.A., until today shall be excluded from the limitation. D. The proceedings of MA. No.66/2023 be consigned to the record room. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (MA No.66/2023) Page 1 of 1
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Dattatrya Anil Thube & another
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
