The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the securitisation application as it had become infructuous due to the filing of a fresh application by the applicant. Pending interlocutory applications were also disposed off.
The securitisation application and all pending interlocutory applications were dismissed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
19.10.2023
| Sr | . No.1 | 6 SA No.273/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi |
ti No. of |
E h |
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.273/2023 | ||
| Rajesaheb Venkatrao Gore ..Applicant Versus Punjab National Bank. ..Respondent Mr. K.J. Suryawanshi h/for Mr. Indrajeet Gore – Advocate for the applicant. Mr. D.Y. Nandedkar– Advocate for the respondent. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. In this matter the learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has already filed the fresh securitisation application and this Securitisation Application has become infructuous and may be disposed off. 2. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the applicant, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.273/2023 stands dismissed. |
||
| B. Accordingly all the pending interlocutory applications stand disposed off. C. File be consigned to the record room. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ]
(SA No.273/2023) Page 1 of 1
Rajesaheb Venkatrao Gore
Punjab National Bank
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
