Allowed

Bank of Baroda v. Rajrajeshwar Electronics and Appliance

DRT20 Oct 2023MA/68/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed a miscellaneous application for the restoration of an original application dismissed for non-prosecution, ordering the filing of necessary documents and restoration of the original application.

What did the court decide?

The miscellaneous application was allowed; claim affidavit and original documents were taken on record; original application No.45/2016 was restored; summons to be issued/completion of pleadings on 02

Bank of Baroda versus Rajrajeshwar Electronics and Appliance — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2023)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD

¶2

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)

¶3

ORDER SHEET

¶4

20. Sr.	10.202 No.65	3 MA No.68/2023
Classific ation	No. of Exh.
		MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No.68/2023 Bank of Baroda ..Applicant Versus Rajrajeshwar Electronics and appliance & others ..Respondent Mrs. Harsha Pande h/for Mr. S.J. Pande - Advocate for the applicant. None for the respondents The matter is taken through Video Conference.
		1. The applicant has filed present Miscellaneous Application No.68/2023 for restoration of Original Application No.45/2016 which was dismissed for non- prosecution as the applicant bank has not filed the claim affidavit and the original documents on record vide order dated 10^thJuly, 2023. 2. The counsel for the applicant bank submits that due to
		oversight the claim affidavit and the original documents
		were also remained to be filed on record. 3. Heard the learned counsels for the applicant, I pass the following order through video conferencing: ORDER
		A. The Miscellaneous Application No.68/2023 is hereby allowed with no order as to costs.
		B. The Claim Affidavit and the Original Documents are

¶5

[SBJ] (MA No.68/2023) Page 1 of 2

¶6

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD

¶7

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)

¶8

ORDER SHEET

¶9

taken on record.
C. The registry is hereby directed to restore the Original
Application No.45/2016 to its original position.
D. List the Original Application No.45/2016 before the
Registrar for issuance of summons to the defendants
/ completion of pleadings on 02 nd December, 2023.
E. The proceedings of MA. No.68/2023 be consigned to the
record room.
(Vimal Gupta)
Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

¶10

[SBJ] (MA No.68/2023) Page 2 of 2

Bank of Baroda v. Rajrajeshwar Electronics and Appliance

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bank of Baroda v. Rajrajeshwar Electronics and Appliance

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bank of Maharashtra versus Raosaheb Raibhan Sarovar

Rajesaheb Venkatrao Gore versus Punjab National Bank

Mrs Gauri Keshav Kale versus Ahmedabad Mercantile Cooperative Bank

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Dattatray Anil Thube

Maharastra Gramin Bank versus Swarupanand Vishwanath Deshmukh

Kiran Bhausaheb Solas versus Phoenix Arc Pvt. Limited