Canara Bank v. D D Jaiswal
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal disposed of OA No. 168/2022 by Canara Bank vs D D Jaiswal after counsel reported the matter was settled, the full amount received by the bank, and the account closed. Orders included returning documents and refunds.
What did the court decide?
Original Application No.168/2022 disposed; documents returned to bank; court fees refunded.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
21.10.2023
| Sr. | No.6 | 8 OA No.168/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| ORIGINAL APPLICATION No.168/2022 Canara Bank ..Applicant Versus D D Jaiswal ..Respondent Mr. V.R. Patil - Advocate for the applicant None for the defendants. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant-bank submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and the entire amount has been received by the bank and the account is closed. He requests for disposal of the matter. 2. The counsel requests for return of the original documents and also refund of the court fees as per rules. 3. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the applicant-bank, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER A. As the account is closed and nothing remains to be paid the Original Application No.168/2022 stands disposed off. |
||
| B. The original title documents, if any filed be returned to the Authorised Officer of the applicant bank as per rules. C. The court fees be refunded as per rules and as per the orders passed by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. D. Consign the file to the Record Room. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (OA No.168/2022) Page 1 of 1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Canara Bank
- respondent
D D Jaiswal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court