The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the Securitisation Application after the respondent bank submitted that the matter was settled, the entire amount received, and the account closed.
The Securitisation Application No.345/2022 stands dismissed as the account is closed and nothing remains to be paid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 2 S |
1.10.2 r. No. |
023 81 SA No.345/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.345/2022 | ||
| Dnyaneshwar Kacharu Apshinde ..Applicant Versus Shivaji Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. ..Respondent None for the applicant. Mr. S.P. Talegaonkar – Advocate for the respondent. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and the entire amount has been received by the bank and the account is closed.He requests for disposal of the matter. 2. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the respondent bank, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER A. As the account is closed and nothing remains to be paid the Securitisation Application No.345/2022 stands dismissed. B. Consign the file to the Record Room. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.345/2022) Page 1 of 1
Dnyaneshwar Kacharu Apshinde
Shivaji Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
