The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad granted an interlocutory application by the applicant bank to withdraw the original application, having received full settlement. The original application was subsequently dismissed.
Original Application No. 129/2023 dismissed; title documents and court fees to be returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 21.10. Sr. No |
2023 .02 |
OA No. 129/2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
||
| INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1871/2023 IN ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 129/2023 |
|||
| India Versu M/s. Mr. P. The m 1. 2. 3. A. B. |
n Bank ..Applicant s Kastum Engineers ..Defendants K. Nikam - Advocate for the applicant. atter is taken through Video Conference. By this interlocutory application No.1871/2023, the applicant bank seeks permission of this Tribunal to withdraw the Original Application. The applicant submits that the entire amount of settlement has been received by the bank as full and final and account is closed. The applicant also seeks return of original documents and refund of the court fees. In view of the above, I pass the following order through Video Conferencing. ORDER Interlocutory Application No.1871/2023 is allowed. Original Application No.129/2023 is dismissed. The original title documents, if any filed be returned as per rules. |
||
| C. D. |
The court fees be refunded as per rules and as per the orders passed by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. Consign the file to the Record Room. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (OA No.129/2023) Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
India
M/s. Mr. P. Kam Bank
M/s. Kastum Engineers
K. Nikam
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
