Ms Prasad v. Canara Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 94 of 2023
(Arising out of M.A. 80 2019 in S.A. 521 of 2018 in DRT-II, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
01.02.2024 M.S. Prasad … Appellant -VsCanara Bank & 2 Others … Respondents None for Appellant
Mr. Omkar Ganguly, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1 and 2
Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mukherjee, Counsel for Respondent No. 3
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
None appears to represent the Appellants while Learned Counsel for Respondents are present.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Appeal No. 94 of 2023, stands dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M.S. Prasad
- respondent
Canara Bank
- respondent
2 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court