The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to condone a 9-day delay in filing the appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and directed the registration of the appeal and listing for hearing.
Application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act allowed; Appeal registered and listed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA (CAMP-HYDERABAD)
(Dy.No.63 of 2023)
(Arising out of MA No.80 of 2019 in S.A. No.521 of 2018 in DRT-II, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
23.06.2023
M.S. Prasad … Appellant -VsCanara Bank & 2 Ors ….Respondents
Mr.Sarosh Bastawala, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. D.L. Kiran Prakash Counsel for Respondent No.1 Mr. J. Srinivas Counsel for Respondent No.2 None for Respondent No.3
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
Compliance of the order dt.11.04.2023 is made with a delay. IA.No.43/2023 is filed by the Appellant u/s.5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 9 days in filing the Appeal. I found ground is sufficient. IA.No.43/2023 is allowed by condoning the delay.
Let the Appeal be registered by providing regular Appeal Number. Respondents may file Opposition within 3 weeks by serving a copy to the Appellant. Appellant may file the rejoinder, if any.
List on 10.08.2023 for hearing the Appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 23rd June, 2023
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.S. Prasad
Canara Bank
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
