Smt. Sushma Tripathi v. Indian Bank (Allahabad Bank)
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 959/2022 Date: 16.05.2023
Present: Shri Ankit Tiwari, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondent-Bank, Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the respondent no. 2-Auction Purchaser,
The office report dated 15.05.2023 shows that no pre-deposit has been made and preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the appeal along with short counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent no. 1, to which no rejoinder has been filed by the appellant. Let the same be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the appellant states that he has no instruction on behalf of the appellant and now the vakalatnama of Shri Hem Pratap Singh, Advocate has been filed on behalf of the appellant, but today it is mentioned that he is busy before the Hon’ble High Court, therefore, he could not appear before this Tribunal. Hence, he seeks adjournment.
List this case on 18.08.2023 for waiver.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
Bank
- intervenor
Auction Purchaser
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 091090009592022
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court