Smt. Sushma Tripathi v. Indian Bank (Allahabad Bank)
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 959/2022 Date: 25.11.2022
Smt. Sushma Tripathi Vs. Indian Bank
Present: Shri Hem Pratap Singh along with Shri K. K. Tiwari, counsel for the appellant, Shri Anuj Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Shri Kush Saxena, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri S. S. Nigam, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the respondent-Auction Purchaser,
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the arguing counsel Shri Kush Saxena is indisposed today, therefore, he is unable to attend this Tribunal and he prays for adjournment.
As requested by the learned counsel for the respondent-bank, list this case on 02.03.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Sushma Tripathi
- respondent
Indian Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 091090009592022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court