No good ground is made out for allowing the restoration application under M.A. No. 23/2021. The application is accordingly dismissed in brief proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 23/2021 In Regular Appeal No. 02/2020 Date: 16.05.2023
Kavita Srivastava Vs. Union Bank of India
Present: Shri Gaurav Bajpai, Advocate holding brief of Shri Amit Khanna, counsel for the applicant, Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Heard the learned counsels for the parties on the restoration application.
No good ground is made out for allowing the restoration application. Hence, the same is liable to be rejected. Accordingly, the restoration application is dismissed.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a good ground is made out for allowing the restoration application.
Kavita Srivastava
Union Bank of India
Amit Khanna
Sandeep Arora
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
