Saroj Bala Singh v. Uco Bank and 2 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 39/2021 Date: 17.07.2023
Saroj Bala Singh Vs. UCO Bank & Ors.
Present: Shri Shresth Pandey, counsel for the appellant, Shri Rakesh Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Himanshu Tiwari, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
The office report dated 14.07.2023 shows that no proof of publication has been filed by the appellant to authenticate service of notice upon the respondent nos. 2 & 3. The said report further shows that no rejoinder has been filed to the reply of the Bank. Let the appellant file proof of publication and rejoinder by the next date.
Learned counsel for the appellant has informed this court that the Hon’ble Apex Court vide order dated 26.09.2022 has passed the interim order with regard to the suit property, photocopy of which has been produced before this court, which is taken on record.
List this case on 01.11.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Saroj Bala Singh
- respondent
UCO Bank & Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 091090000392021
- Topic
- Property and Title
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court