Saroj Bala Singh v. Uco Bank and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal adjourned for service of notice on unserved respondents; appellant directed to serve notices within a week by two modes and file affidavit.
What did the court decide?
None granted; directions for service of notice issued.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 39/2021 Date: 31.05.2022
Saroj Bala Singh Vs. UCO Bank & Ors.
Present: Shri Vipul Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ashok Pandey, counsel for the appellant, Shri Himanshu Tiwari, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel Shri Ashok Pandey is out of station, therefore, he prays for adjournment.
The office report dated 30.05.2022 shows that no steps have been taken by the counsel for the appellant for service of notice upon the remaining unserved respondents. Let the steps be taken by the appellant for service of notice upon the remaining respondents within a week by two modes i.e. Registered Post with A.D. and Speed Post. Affidavit of service along with tracking report be filed by the next date.
List this case on 16.09.2022 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Saroj Bala Singh
- respondent
UCO Bank & Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court