Raj Narayan v. State Bank of India and 6 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Counsel for the appellant was indisposed and unable to appear, resulting in this appeal being adjourned to 05.02.2024 for hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 91/2017 Date: 28.11.2023
Raj Narayan Vs. State Bank of India and Ors.
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri Kushal Kant, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondent-Bank,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant that the arguing counsel Shri Kushal Kant is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment on his behalf.
As prayed, list this case on 05.02.2024 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Raj Narayan
- respondent
State Bank of India and Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court