Manoj Kumar v. Canara Bank and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order in an appeal regarding interest on auction amount. The respondent bank was granted time to produce documents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 50/2018 Date: 11.01.2023
Manoj Kumar Vs. Canara Bank and Ors.
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellant, Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondents no. 1 & 2-Bank,
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that since the matter relates to the year of 2012 and the records are under search, hence he needs some time to produce the documents from very beginning when the auction purchaser was offered the auction amount and the same was refused, therefore, no interest on the auction amount is payable to the auction purchaser.
List this case on 11.04.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Manoj Kumar
Canara Bank
Justice R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court