Quarmatic Time Industries v. State Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. 591/2022 (WoD) In Appeal on Diary No. 113/2022
Between
M/s. Quarmatic Time Industries & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s. State Bank of India …Respondent/s
Mr Dileep Nevatia, Appellant No.2 in person is present. Ms Fatima Lakdawala, Advocate for Respondent.
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of Praecipe filed by the Appellant seeking urgent relief.
The learned counsel now appearing for the Respondent Bank submits that there is a change in Vakaltnama and that she was only instructed yesterday with regard to the matter and seeks time for a reply.
The reply, if any, shall be filed within two weeks on the application for waiver of pre-deposit with an advance copy to the other side.
Post on 07.02.2023 for hearing.
psa-05
1
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Quarmatic Time Industries & Anr.
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court