This order addresses an interim application for condonation of delay to bring legal representatives of a deceased intervener on record. The court accepted the reasons involving the COVID-19 pandemic and dispensed with notice to certain respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 20/2023 (CoD in LR)
In
Misc. Appeal No. 220/2009
Between
Sushil Chhugani … Applicant (Legal Heir of the Intervener)
In The Matter of
.... Appellant/s …Respondent/s And
Rekha Indur Chhugani V/s.
Indian Overseas Bank & Ors.
Indur Kartar Chhugani
.... Intervener
Ms Saakshi Saboo & Ms Vrushali Agarwal, i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co., Advocate for Appellant & Intervener.
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of Praecipe filed by Appellant for seeking urgent relief.
The application at Diary No. 424/2022 is for condonation of delay for bringing on record the legal representatives of the deceased intervener.
1
deceased intervener. According to the applicant, a delay is only 9 days but the office calculated a delay of 44 days.
Post on 23.01.2023 for hearing
psa-30
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the application to bring legal representatives of the deceased intervener on record should be condoned.
Whether notice should be issued to Respondents 2 to 5 in the interim intervention application.
Sushil Chhugani
Rekha Indur Chhugani & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
