The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The appeal was admitted on file following the payment of pre-deposit and finding the explanation for delay sufficient.
Condonation of delay in filing the appeal allowed; appeal taken on file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 249/2023 (CoD) In Appeal on Diary No. 1113/2022
Between
M/s. Quarmatic T ime Industries&Anr. … Appellant/s V/s. State Bank of In d ia &Anr. …Respondent/s n. Mr. Dileep Nava t ia, Appellant No.2, present in pers o Ms. Regina Da v id, i/b Ms. Fatima Lakadwal a , Advocate for . Respondent No. 1
-: Order dated: 26/04/2023:-
The A ppellant has complied with t h e order of this Tribunal dated 1 1 .04.2023 by making the pre-depos i t. I.A. N o. 249/2023 is an application fo r condonation of delay. The impu g ned order is dated 18.08.2022 an d the appeal was filed only on 20.10.2022 with three days delay. T h e delay has been explained suffici e ntly. The application for condo n ation of delay is vehemently op p osed by the Ld.Counsel ap p earing for the Respondents. O n going through the application I, find that there is no reason to dec l ine the prayer for condonation of delay. Hence, the . delay is condone d
The A ppeal shall be taken on file if t h ere are no other defects to be cur e d. Reply, if any, shall be filed by t h e Respondent at the earliest.
Post o n 12.05.2023 before Registrar.
rm-16
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay in filing the appeal under I.A. No. 249/2023.
M/s. Quarmatic Time Industries & Anr
State Bank of India & Anr
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
