Appeal against condonation of delay order heard before the DRAT, Mumbai. Registry directed to file the appeal if no defects exist and post for hearing fixed.
Delay of 2 days in filing appeal condoned; appeal permitted to be filed if no defects.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 647/2022 (CoD)
In Appeal on Diary No. 442/2022
Between
Sayyad Zameer Sayyad Sailani & Ors.
V/s.
The Pusad Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Anr. …Respondent/s An Advocate for Appellant is present.
The Appellants impugn the order in I.A. 591/2022 dated 10.05.2022 in S.A. 149/2022 on the files of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (D.R.T.), Nagpur. The application for waiver was heard and the pre-deposit as directed was made. The Appeal is filed with the delay of 2 days and for the reason stated in the application for condonation of delay, the Appellant seeks to condone it.
No reply has been filed by the Respondent on this application for condonation of delay. The reason stated for the delay is explained and I find no reason to decline the request to condone the delay. The application is allowed and a delay of 2 days is condoned.
The registry is directed to take the appeal on file if there are no other defects to be cured.
Post on 24.01.2023 for a hearing before the Registrar.
psa-02
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the 2-day delay in filing the appeal.
Sayyad Zameer Sayyad Sailani & Ors.
The Pusad Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
