The tribunal standardized the procedure for listing applications under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC read with Section 22(2)(b) of the RDB Act for hearing on adjourned dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 33 of 2021
(Arising out of S.A. 235 of 2019 in DRT-1 Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
10.01.2023 N. Dilip Kumar & Anr. … Appellants -VsSouth Indian Bank & Anr. … Respondents Mr. N. Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. A. Pramanik, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. 17 of 2013 is an application filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of CPC read with Section 22(2)(b) of the RDB Act, 1993 seeking permission to produce additional evidence. Objection, if any, be filed by the respondents with advance copy to the appellant, who may file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
List the I.A. 17 of 2023 on 24.03.2023 for disposal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 10 January, 2023 13/pkb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission to produce additional evidence shall be granted.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
