Kennington Industries Private Limited v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The bench allowed an interim application for waiver of personal liability and fixed the main appeal for 30th March 2023, continuing an interim order until that date.
What did the court decide?
I.A. No. 277 of 2022 (application for waiver) allowed. Opposition to appeal noted. Appeal listed for 30.03.2023.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 414 of 2022 (Arising out of S.A. 95 of 2021 in DRT-I ,Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
09.01.2023 M/s. Kennington Industries Private Limited … Appellant -VsState Bank of India & 3 ors … Respondent
Ms. D.N. Sharma, Learned Counsel, Ms. Sanjukra Mukherjee, Learned Counsel, Ms. Urbi Roy, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. No. 277 of 2022 application for waiver is moved by the Appellant. Learned Counsel the Appellant submits that he is neither the borrower nor the guarantor. Learned Counsel for the Respondent has not filed any written objection but orally objected for the Respondents.
Having considered the submissions made by the Learned Counsel for the parties, I find the Appellant’s ground to be sufficient. Accordingly, I.A. No. 277 of 2022 is allowed. Opposition to the Appeal filed today by the Respondent is taken on record. Copy is served upon the Appellant who may file rejoinder within three weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Kennington Industries Private Limited
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court