N Dilip Kumar v. South Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Order permitting impleadment of borrowers as respondents to comply with earlier directive; application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 33 of 2021
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
04.10.2023 N. Dilip Kumar … Appellant -VsSouth Indian Bank ... Respondent Mr. Sudhir Kumar Senapati with Mr. Devajyoti Barman, Learned Counsel for the Appellant
Mr. Anirban Pramanik with Mr. Punarbasu Nath, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. 380 of 2023
Application is filed by the Appellant in compliance of the order dated 21st August, 2023 for impleading the Borrowers as Respondents, namely M/s Abhinava Fine Chemicals, Mrs. Subbarangamma and Mr. P. Mallewsham in the appeal. Since the application is in compliance of the order and Borrowers are necessary parties, Appellant is permitted to implead them as party Respondents. Necessary amendment be carried out within three days.
Notices be issued upon the newly added Respondents and Affidavit-of-Service be filed within two weeks.
Opposition may be filed by the Respondents within four weeks with copy to the Appellant who may file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
I.A. 380 of 2023 is allowed.
List on 11th January, 2024 for hearing of the appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 04th October, 2023
08/ac
N. Dilip Kumar
South Indian Bank
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court