Bank Of Baroda v. Waheeda Sultana
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 305 of 2018)
(Arising out of S.A. No. 13 of 2007 in DRT -1 Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
| CHAIRPERSON | |
|---|---|
| 21.03.2023 | Bank of Baroda … Appellant -Vs- Waheda Sultana ….Respondents |
| Mr. S. Naskar, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Gaurav Singh, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 Mr. Nirmalya Biswas, Learned |
|
| Counsel for the Respondent No. 2. |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 prays for and is granted one week’s time to file the opposition with copy to the Appellant who may file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. Opposition filed by the Respondent No. 1 be also served upon the Appellant.
List on 20th June, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 21st March, 2023 9/tp
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
Waheda Sultana
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court