Bank Of Baroda v. Waheeda Sultana
Case brief
What is this about?
Tribunal granted time to respondents to file opposition and set hearing date. No substantive order passed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 305 of 2018)
(Arising out of S. A. No. 13 of 2007 in DRT 1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
02.01.2023
Bank of Baroda … Appellant -VsWaheeda Sultana
….Respondents Ms. Ishita Ghosh, Learned Counsel Mr. A. Guha, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Gaurav Singh, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1. Mr. Nirmalya Biswas, Learned Counsel, Ms. Pompey Basu, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 2.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 submits that he will file the opposition during the course of the day with copy to the Appellant who may file the rejoinder within a period of three weeks. Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 prays for and granted three weeks’ time to file the opposition with copy to the Appellant who may file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. None is present for the Respondent No. 3.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
Waheeda Sultana
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court