Interim order in Appeal No. 305 of 2018 noting insufficient service of notice. No disposal of the appeal was made.
to issue a fresh notice to the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 305 of 2018
(Arising out of S.A. 13 of 2007 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.08.2022 Bank of Baroda … Applicant -VsWaheeda Sultana … Respondent Mr. Avisekh Guha, learned counsel with Ms. Ishita Ghosh, Learned Counsel for the appellant None for the respondent.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Heard Learned Counsel for the appellant.
Affidavit of service filed by the appellant shows that respondent was served, but service was effective in the year 2019. It would be appropriate in the interest of justice that a fresh notice be issued upon the respodnent.
List the matter on 27.09.2022 for disposal of I.A. 227 of 2018.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 22nd Aughst, 2022 03/pkb
Bank of Baroda
Waheeda Sultana
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
