Central Bank of India v. Pvrl Ranjith
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was held infructuous and disposed of by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata. No detailed reasons were provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 36 of 2021)
(Arising out of S.A. No. 118 of 2021 in DRT Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
21 .03.2023
Central Bank of India … Appellant -VsPVRL Ranjith & ors ….Respondents Mr. S.K. Senapati, Learned Counsel for the Appellant None for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Appellant endorses on the memo of Appeal that Appeal has become infructuous. Accordingly, Appeal is disposed of as infructuous.
Pending I.A.s if any, are disposed of accordingly. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to the Appellant and the Respondent and the copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record Room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court today.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 21st March, 2023 7/tp
2
Central Bank of India
PVRL Ranjith & ors
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court