Satyabhama Namita Dalai And Others v. Uco Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 28 of 2021
(Arising out of S.A. 108 of 2019 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
21.03.2023 Satyabhama @ Namita Dalai & 2 Others … Appellants -VsUCO Bank & 5 Others … Respondents
Mr. Sailesh Mishra, Learned Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3/ Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the revised list.
None appears to represent the Appellants while Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank is present.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Diary No. 28 of 2021, stands dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court