The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable because the appellant failed to comply with the prior order dated 6th February, 2023, regarding the required predeposit.
No relief granted as the appeal was dismissed for non-maintainability due to failure to make predeposit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 261 of 2018
(Arising out of S.A. 42 of 2011 in DRT-I, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
31.03.2023 Garlapati Upendar Reddy … Appellant -VsState Bank of India … Respondent Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant Ms. Mekhala Kanji, Learned Counsel for the Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Compliance of the order dated 6th February, 2023 regarding predeposit is not made.
Accordingly the instant appeal, being Appeal No. 261 of 2018, is dismissed as not maintainable for non compliance of making pre deposit.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents
and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 31st March, 2023
04/ac
Garlapati Upendar Reddy
State Bank of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
