The DRTA Kolkata dismissed the appeal as not maintainable due to the appellant's failure to comply with the order dated 6th February, 2023 regarding the predeposit.
Appeal dismissed as not maintainable for non-compliance of predeposit order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 32 of 2020
(Arising out of S.A. 238 of 2017 in DRT, Vishakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
31.03.2023 M/s. Sri Surya Ginning And Pressing Industries … Appellant -VsAuthorised Officer, State Bank of India & 2 Others … Respondent Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for the Respondents No. 1 and 2/ Bank
Ms. Pallavi Ray, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 3
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Compliance of the order dated 6th February, 2023 regarding predeposit is not made.
Accordingly the instant appeal, being Diary No. 32 of 2020, is dismissed as not maintainable for non compliance of making pre deposit.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents
and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 31st March, 2023
03/ac
M/s. Sri Surya Ginning And Pressing Industries
Authorised Officer, State Bank of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
