APPEAL No. 113 OF 2022 FILED BY M/S. MEHEK ENTERPRISES BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA WAS DISMISSED IN DEFAULT AS NONE APPEARED TO REPRESENT THE APPELLANTS UNDER RULE 2(1)(G) OF THE DRT RULES.
APPEAL DISMISSED IN DEFAULT; PENDING INTERNAL ACCORDS CLOSED; INTERIM ORDERS VACATED.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 113 of 2022
(Arising out of S.A. 38 of 2020 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
31.03.2023 M/s. Mehek Enterprises & 2 Others … Appellants -VsAuthorised Officer, Bank of Baroda & Another … Respondents
None for Appellants
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
None appears to represent the Appellants.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Appeal No. 113 of 2022, stands dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 31st March, 2023
06/ac
M/s. Mehek Enterprises & 2 Others
Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda & Another
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
