The tribunal directed the appellant to forthwith file a reply. The respondent was granted two weeks to file the reply. No hearing was scheduled for the present date clearly. The order was adjourned to a future date.
Two weeks to file reply was granted. Another hearing scheduled on 02.03.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 203/2006
Between
Yeshwant Shriniwas Pulgam … Appellant/s V/s.
State Bank of India & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr Raju Uttam Shinde along with Mr Shrinivas Chigani, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr Naval T., i/b M/s. Rony & Co., Advocate for Respondent.
The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent Bank seeks further time to file a reply stating that there has been a change in Vakaltnama.
The reply shall be filed within two weeks.
No further time will be granted.
The parties shall get ready for hearing positively on 02.03.2023.
psa-03
Sd/Chairperson
1
Yeshwant Shriniwas Pulgam
State Bank of India & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
