Shri Yeshwant Shriniwas Pulgam v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Court listed the appeal for hearing on 11.01.2023. Separate counsel for respondent requested two weeks to file a reply. No substantive decision recorded.
Court listed the appeal for hearing on 11.01.2023. Separate counsel for respondent requested two weeks to file a reply. No substantive decision recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 203/2006
Between
Shri Yeshwant Shriniwas Pulgam
… Appellant/s
V/s.
State Bank of India & Ors.
…Respondent/s
Mr Raju Uttam Shinde, Advocate for Appellant. Ms Vinaya Chavan, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 Bank.
The learned counsel for Respondent No. 1 seeks two weeks’ time to file a reply.
Reply, if any, shall be filed within two weeks.
No further adjournment will be granted.
Post on 11.01.2023 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-08
1
Shri Yeshwant Shriniwas Pulgam
State Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court