State Bank of India v. Smt Asha Debnath and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant's appeal was dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. Interim orders were vacated. The file was consigned to the Record Room.
The appellant's appeal was dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. Interim orders were vacated. The file was consigned to the Record Room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 127 of 2018
(Arising out of SA No. 1419 of 2013 in DRT-2 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
03.08.2023 State Bank of India and ors ... Appellants -VsSmt. Asha Debnath & ors ... Respondent Mr. Debasish Saha, Learned Counsel for the Appellant. Mr. D. Basu Roy, Learned Counsel Ms. Rubi Adak, Ms. Shreya Basu, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
At the very outset, Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that he may be permitted to not press the Appeal with liberty to file afresh. Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
Pending I.A.s if any, are disposed of accordingly. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to the Appellant and the Respondent and the copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record Room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court today.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 3rd August, 2023 18/tp
2
State Bank of India
Smt. Asha Debnath
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court