This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 127 of 2018)
(Arising out of S.A. 1419 of 2013 in DRT-1, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
| 08.08.2022 | State Bank of India & 2 Others … Appellants -vs- Gouranga Debnath & Another … Respondents |
|---|---|
| Mr. Debasish Saha, Learned Counsel for Appellant |
|
| Mr. Debabrata Basu Ray with Ms. Ruby Adak and Ms. Sharmistha Poddar, Learned Counsel for Respondents |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. 162 of 2022
At the very outset, Learned Counsel for Respondent has preliminary raised objection that the application is not in accordance with law and prays for dismissal.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant prays for, and is granted, time to file proper substitution application in accordance with law.
I.A. 162 of 2022 is rejected with liberty to file afresh.
List on 7th September, 2022 for hearing.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 8th August, 2022 15/ac
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an interim application is maintainable when raised non-conforming with the law.
State Bank of India
Gouranga Debnath
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court