Dipak Kumar Giri v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata dismissed the appeal as withdrawn by the appellant, who cited a settlement between parties.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. No. 383 of 2020 (Arising out of SA No. 116 of 2019 in DRT-II Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
02.08.2023
Dipak Kumar Giri ... Appellants -VsCanara Bank & Anr ... Respondent Mr. Ritick Chaudhury, Learned Counsel Mr. Ditimoy Paul, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Omkar Ganguly, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the matter is settled between the parties. Appellant is withdrawing the Appeal. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending I.A.s if any, are disposed of accordingly. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to the Appellant and the Respondent and the copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record Room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court today.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dipak Kumar Giri
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 191090003832020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court