Dipak Kumar Banik and Anr. v. City Union Bank Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. No. 391 of 2022
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
13.12.2023 Dipak Kumar Banik & Anr ... Appellants -VsThe A.O, City Union Bank Ltd. & Anr ……Respondents Mr. P. Pal, Learned Counsel, Mr. Suddhasattwa Bhattacharyya Learned Counsel for the Appellant. Mr. Anirban Pramanik with Mr. Rajarshi Kundu, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 & 2/Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit of service shows that Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are not served. Let the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 be served afresh. Bank may provide the addresses of Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 as available in the Bank to the Appellant within a week. Affidavit of service be filed within three weeks.
List on 16th February, 2024 for hearing.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 13th December, 2023 4/tp
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dipak Kumar Banik & Anr
- respondent
The A.O, City Union Bank Ltd. & Anr
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court