Dipak Kumar Banik and Anr. v. City Union Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Nil. The document contains only the list of parties and record of opposition; it provides no reasoning, holding, or decision.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. No. 391 of 2022
(Arising out of S.A. No. 388 of 2021 in DRT 3 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
19.12.2022 Mr. Dipak Kumar Banik & Anr … Appellant -vsThe A.O. City Union Bank Ltd. & Anr …..Respondent
Mr. Prasenjit Pal, Learned Counsel for the Appellants Mr. Anirban Pramanik, Learned Counsel with Ms. S. Dey, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Opposition to Appeal filed by the Respondent is taken on record. Reply filed by the Appellant is also taken on record.
List on 25th January, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 19th December, 2022 7/tp
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. Dipak Kumar Banik & Anr
- respondent
The A.O. City Union Bank Ltd. & Anr
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court