Dipak Kumar Banik and Anr. v. City Union Bank Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 391 of 2022
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
08.08.2023 Dipak Kumar Banik & Another … Appellants -VsCity Union Bank Limited & 4 Others ... Respondents Mr. Suddhasattwa Bhattacharyya, Learned Counsel for the Appellants Mr. Anirban Pramanik with Mr. Rajarshi Kundu, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 &2/Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Opposition filed by Respondent No. 1 and 2 is taken on record. Respondent No. 5 is served. Respondents No. 3 and 4 are not served.
Let fresh notices be issued to the Respondents No. 3 and 4 and Affidavit-of-Service be filed within two weeks. List on 12th September, 2023 for hearing of appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 08th August, 2023 03/ac
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dipak Kumar Banik
- respondent
City Union Bank Limited
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court