Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Minakshi Ray
Case brief
What is this about?
This bench dismissed a miscellaneous application seeking expeditious disposal of a severed special appeal. The respondent argued the principal appeal was heard in parts by the lower court and remained pending. Liberty was granted to pursue expeditious disposal before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed; liberty granted to press for expeditious disposal before the learned DRT.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc Appl. Dy No. 801 of 2023
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
13.12.2023
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. & Anr.
… Appellants Vs.
Minakshi Roy
….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh, ld. Adv. Ms. Atika Ariss, ld. Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Nimesh Mishra, ld. Adv. Ms. Sweta Gandhi, ld. Adv.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. This Miscellaneous Application is filed by the applicant for expeditious disposal of S.A. 290 of 2022. It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondent that S.A. was heard in part by the learned DRT but could not be concluded. Next date is fixed for hearing. Accordingly, instant application is liable to be dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. & Anr.
- respondent
Minakshi Roy
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 191090008012023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court