Ishrat Jahan v. State Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 10/2021 Date: 12.01.2023
Ishrat Jahan Vs. State Bank of India & Ors.
Present: None for the appellant, Shri Dharmendra Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Shri S. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri S. K. Gupta, Advocate holding brief of Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the respondent no. 2, None for the respondent no. 5,
The office report dated 11.01.2023 shows that pursuant to the earlier order dated 19.10.2022, no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 5 inspite of several opportunities being granted. Accordingly, the right of said respondents to file reply is hereby closed. The report further shows that the proof of publication with regard to the service of notice upon the respondent no. 3 & 4 has been filed, but no one has put in appearance on their behalf. Let the said respondents put in appearance and file reply by the next date.
List this case along with Appeals Dy. No. 172/2020 and 173/2020 on 12.04.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ishrat Jahan
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court