Ishrat Jahan v. State Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 10/2021 Date: 12.04.2023
Ishrat Jahan Vs. State Bank of India & Ors.
Present: Shri Ashok Pandey, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondent-Bank, Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the respondent no. 2, None for the respondent no. 5,
It has been brought to the notice of this court that the arguing counsel Shri S. K. Srivastava is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence the adjournment is sought for.
The office report dated 11.04.2023 shows that no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents no. 3 & 4 inspite of several opportunities being granted. As last opportunity, let the said respondents file reply by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
List this case along with Appeals Dy. No. 172/2020 and 173/2020 on 31.07.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ishrat Jahan
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court