Ishrat Jahan v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Personal appearance granted due to counsel unavailability. Office report noted for two respondents failing to file replies. Case listed for next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 10/2021 Date: 22.11.2023
Ishrat Jahan Vs. State Bank of India & Ors.
Present: Shri Ashok Pandey, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondent-Bank, Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the respondent no. 2, None for the respondent no. 5,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the respondent-bank that the arguing counsel Shri S. K. Srivastava is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment on his behalf.
The office report dated 21.11.2023 shows that no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents no. 3 & 4 inspite of several opportunities being granted. As last opportunity, let the respondents no. 3 & 4 file reply by the next date, failing which right to file reply shall stand closed.
List this case on 23.02.2024 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Ishrat Jahan
State Bank of India
Others
R. D. Khare
Anupam
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court