Mohd Irfan v. prathama up Gramin bank
Case brief
What is this about?
This order notes the absence of replies to the memo of appeal and waiver application. The court directed parties to file missing documents by the next date and listed the case for 08.02.2024 for waiver proceedings.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 1122/2023 Date: 28.11.2023
Mohd. Irfan Vs. Prathama U.P. Gramin Bank
Present: Shri A. K. Pal, Advocate holding brief of Shri S. K. Gupta, counsel for the appellant, Shri Avinash Jaiswal, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sanjai Singh, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Ashok Bhatnagar, counsel for the respondent no. 2- Auction Purchaser,
The office report dated 24.11.2023 shows that no reply has been filed by the respondent-bank nor by the respondent no. 2 to the memo of appeal and no rejoinder has been filed by the appellant to the reply filed by the respondent no. 2 on the waiver application. Let the same be filed by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
List this case on 08.02.2024 for waiver.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant and respondent-bank filed required replies to the memo of appeal and waiver application.
To list the matter for hearing regarding the waiver application.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohd. Irfan
- respondent
Prathama U.P. Gramin Bank
- respondent
Auction Purchaser
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 091090011222023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court