The DRAT directed the implementation of an amended order. The court instructed parties to exchange documents and file a reply within four weeks, and listed the matter for hearing on 30.03.2023. No substantive decision is recorded in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 23/2022
Between
Shyam Pannalal Jaiswal & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s.
Fullerton India Home Finance Co. Ltd. …Respondent/s
Mr Atul K. Ojha, Advocate for Appellant No.2
Mr Rajesh Nagori, i/b Ms Sanjana Ghogare, Advocate for Respondent.
Mr Gajendra A. Rajput, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 & 3
The amendment as directed has been carried out.
A copy of the amended Appeal Memorandum shall be handed over to the Respondent and a reply shall be filed by the Respondent within four weeks.
Post on 30.03.2023 for hearing
psa-08
Sd/Chairperson
1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shyam Pannalal Jaiswal & Anr.
Fullerton India Home Finance Co. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
