Shyam Pannalal Jaiswal v. Fullerton India Home Finance Co. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
In Misc. Appeal 23/2022, the chairperson allowed time for filing a reply which was filed belatedly and did not dispose of the matter by granting a date for hearing.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal 23/2022
Between
Shyam Pannalal Jaiswal & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s. Fullerton India Home Finance Co. Ltd. …Respondent/s Ms. Shyamali Gawade, Advocate for Appellant. Ms. Sanjana Ghogare, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. Gajendra A. Rajput, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 & 3
And Appeal No. 14/2022
Between
Shyam Pannalal Jaiswal & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mrs. M.R. Behere, Advocate for Appellant. Ms. Shyamali Gawade, Advocate for Respondent. Ms. Sanjana Ghogare, Advocate for Respondent No.3 Mr. Gajendra A. Rajput, Advocate for Respondent No. 4 & 5
The Ld. Counsel appearing for Respondent submits that the reply has been filed belatedly and not as directed to be filed within four weeks vide order dated 11.01.2023.
The application for condonation of delay in filing the reply shall be considered.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shyam Pannalal Jaiswal & Anr.
- respondent
Fullerton India Home Finance Co. Ltd.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court