Kushwant Kumar and Anr. v. U C O Bank and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Dy. No. 601/2022 discussed delay in filing affidavit of service and reply for respondents. Court extended time and directed filing by next date. Listed for future hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 601/2022 Date: 24.04.2023
Present: None for the appellant, Shri Himanshu Tiwari, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Umesh Tiwari, counsel for the respondent no. 4,
The office report dated 21.04.2023 shows that pursuant to the earlier order dated 23.01.2023, no affidavit of service has been filed to authenticate the service of notice upon the respondents and no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 2 & 3-Bank, although the time was granted to them. Let the served respondents file reply by the next date.
List this case on 10.08.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court