Kushwant Kumar and Anr. v. U C O Bank and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listed for 08.12.2023; counsel noted appellant absent; Bank counsel submitted appeal became infructuous after withdrawal of S. 14 order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 601/2022 Date: 21.11.2023
Kushwant Kumar & Anr. Vs. UCO Bank & Ors.
Present: None for the appellants, Shri Himanshu Tiwari, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Umesh Tiwari, counsel for the respondent no. 4,
Learned counsel for the respondent-bank submits that the present appeal has become infructuous in view of the fact that the order under section 14 has been withdrawn by the Bank. However, the counsel for the appellant is not present today, therefore, the learned counsel for the appellant may verify the submission raised by the counsel for the respondent-Bank.
List this case on 08.12.2023. It is made clear that the matter will not be adjourned on the date fixed.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kushwant Kumar & Anr.
- respondent
UCO Bank & Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 091090006012022
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court