A S R E C (India) Ltd. v. Maruti Steel Tubes and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Mention order noting the appellant's arguing counsel was indisposed, granting an adjournment, and listing for reply; respondents noted lack of appeal copy.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 322/2022 Date: 13.02.2023
ASREC (India) Ltd. Vs. Maruti Steel Tubes and Ors.
Present: Shri Avinash Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the appellant, Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the respondent no. 1, 2 & 3- Borrowers,
Today, a mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant that the arguing counsel Shri Sandeep Arora is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment.
Learned counsel for the respondents-Borrowers submits that he has not received copy of appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he shall serve the same within 48 hours, who may file reply by the next date.
List this case on 05.04.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
ASREC (India) Ltd.
- respondent
Maruti Steel Tubes
- respondent
Ors. (Borrowers)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 091090003222022
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court