Aman Khetrapal v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a brief order from a bench of Justice R. D. Khare regarding Appeal Dy. No. 123/2023. The respondent-Bank requested an adjournment due to the indisposition of its arguing counsel. The Tribunal listed the case for rejoinder on 16.02.2023.
What did the court decide?
Case adjourned and listed for rejoinder on 16.02.2023.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 123/2023 Date: 10.02.2023
Aman Khetrapal Vs. Union Bank of India
Present: Shri S. K. Pandey, counsel for the appellant, Shri Avinash Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Today, a mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the respondent-Bank that the arguing counsel Shri Sandeep Arora is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment.
List this case on 16.02.2023 for rejoinder.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Aman Khetrapal
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 091090001232023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court